Archive for the ‘Articles’ Category

Are you helping or adding to the burden?

Monday, August 10th, 2009

By Vincent Ignacio

As a recruitment agency, we pride ourselves that Notre Dame Oilfields Maritime Services has a social conscience and supportive of our country’s economic development. Many have benefited from our efforts to secure more jobs for our Filipino seafarers and offshore workers. Provided that they already have the necessary requirements such as trainings, work experience and have a clean bill of health, we can help them land a job on board a vessel or an offshore project.

With our agency, our applicants don’t need to bribe us so they can get work. While it is true that sea-based recruitment agencies are not allowed by the Philippine government to collect placement fees, other greedy agencies still collect grease money from their applicants. Sadly, this has been the norms since the 70’s and hasn’t changed up to now. As of this writing, the going rate is between 50,000 to 60,000 pesos each applicant.

One story that reached me is about a Filipino merchant marine officer who was personally escorted to the airport by the lady owner of a recruitment agency. As he was about to enter the passengers lounge, the lady owner handed him a piece of paper. Written on the piece of paper was her bank account details and she told him to deposit $200 into it every month as payment to her for helping him get a job.

Well that’s just one story out of so many that we encounter in our office. I believe that most of our Filipino seafarers have already accepted this behavior as SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) among sea-based recruitment agencies thus they never bother to report it to the proper authorities. Others were even threatened by these same recruitment agencies that they will have them blacklisted if they complain. Well, they are just that, threats. If no one will take action against these greedy recruitment agencies, they will continue to take advantage on our less informed Filipino seafarers.

Overseas Filipino workers have funneled billions of dollars into the Philippine economy in 2008 alone. They were not only able to provide for their families but also help keep our economy afloat. Every time their loved ones spend their hard-earned remittances, new money is being circulated into our economy.

Again, I would like to take this opportunity to thank our clients and their representatives. Many were able to go to school, buy their medicine, have food to eat on their tables, in short, many lives changed for the better because of your trust in us as your recruitment agent here in the Philippines. May God prosper your companies more!

Notre Dame Taking-Off This 2009 With A Blast

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

By Vincent Ignacio

The year 2008 has not ended yet but I was able to foretell that the following year will be a very good year for Notre Dame Oilfields Maritime Services. I remember opening my company email on Christmas day to find dozens of email inquiries from shipowners and ship managers interested in availing our services.

Our company’s reputation of delivering our obligations on time, our competitive pricing, and the high quality of manpower that we provide is the reason why our company is slowly but surely becoming recognized by principals from all over the world.

While our competitors dispatch seafarers based on the amount of money their applicants has bribed them (known locally as “lagay”), our agency has a strict “walang lagay” (no bribe) policy and our only objective is to deliver the most qualified, documented and well-trained seafarers thereby providing true economic value for our clients.

It is our agency’s obligation to set a good example for the other manning agencies. Money is not always the bottom line. Having a “good name” is the only legacy that we can leave this world long after we are gone.

I would also like to take this opportunity to thank our old clients for their conviction and trust in us. And also to welcome our new clients. Your willingness to bank on us will serve as our inspiration to further commit ourselves to the highest levels of integrity and professionalism.

Human Errors and System Failure

Monday, September 29th, 2008

By Zeny C. Rabina

Human errors has been cited as a cause or contributing factor in disasters and accidents in the shipping industry. It is very vital to stress out that “HUMAN ERROR” is the same as “HUMAN PERFORMANCE” which is actually part of the ordinary spectrum of human behaviour.

As the process of errors caused accident is diverse, it can be said that human behavior and mind are not perfect and faultless, therefore it is necesary for each and everyone to research how navigator makes an error, how its error cause marine collision accidents. Basis this, the people concerned msut be able to build an effective preventive measures against accidents as well as how to decrease of actual casualties.

One important steps to make this system work is the seafarers to have proper training regarding emergency preparedness in maritime education which will be implemented to reduce the risk of human error most especially in the operation and maintenance of marine equipment.

We all know that the seafarers plays an important role in working with the sytem. They are the one who make it work/happen. They are the end user of the system, their participation and involvement is required during the development and implementation stage.

We must always remember that “KNOWLEDGE AND TRAININGS” gives the seafarers the best chance to cope with an emergency.

The Shipboard Management Structure

Saturday, September 20th, 2008

By Ieuan Dolby

It has oft been asked by those ashore how a ship operates, who is in-charge and ignorance shines forth when an engineer is asked “and when will you become Captain”! It is therefore time to lay-to-rest some of these myths and to give explanation as to what foundation a ships management structure is based upon.

Every business whether it is a high-flying banking firm or the local plumbers outfit a management structure in place. In a smaller ad-hoc company down the road the management structure may consist of one man sitting in an office, who barks out order like a sniffer dog struck lucky, to a down trodden son who has no choice in the matter or a large wall street firm that has hundreds of workers, many VP’s, directors and a chairman who nobody ever sees.

Whatever company looked at there is a structure in place, whether it is the ideal structure and whether it works or is practical in real life is not important except to say that like all businesses, cruise ships, gas tankers, ferries, rowing boats and offshore supply vessels all have a management structure in place.

A vessels management structure is extremely defined! It is built on decades of culture and formulation and has adapted and changed with time to produce a system that is at first glance ideal, it covers all aspects of shipboard operations and lifestyles and is tightly regulated through strict control from ashore. A seafarer cannot rise up the ranks of structure to a higher position unless he has sat and passed the requisite number of exams, he cannot become a self-imposed boss through financial wangling, bribery or luck or through the showing of family wealth to impose authority. The only way that any seafarer can climb the management structures ladder is to have the right qualification and the only way to get the right qualification is to study at college, pass a written exam or two and be interrogated by an experienced surveyor who should know what he is talking about. Even this might not be the last step to increased authority; the company primarily must approve the promotion subject to availability, suitability and requirement. It is only recently that officers are able to sail in a higher position upon receipt of their new qualification due to the shortage of seafarers worldwide. Ten, even twenty years ago, many officers of junior rank would hold the highest available ticket yet be unable to sail in that position. They might hold that ticket for five or more years before a position came available and they were promoted.

Many people assume from having watched weird films(set on a ship that is mysteriously plummeting to the sea-bed with a pack of rabid dogs onboard or sea snakes overtaking a vessel as steams along) that authority is defined by the number of stripes one wears on their shoulders. Certainly, this noted fact is distinct on many vessels, the higher up on the ladder one is the more stripes they have to weigh them down; after the Titanic disaster Engineers were eventually acknowledged as being integral to the operation of a vessel and were given officer status (represented by purple stripes to the outside of the gold). But uniforms are not necessary, they are merely a status symbol, a method used to implement authority and structure but with or without the uniform the structure remains in place. Uniforms might be necessary on ships were large crews operate, where faces are often unrecognizable amongst the crowd and so the wearing of a badge identifies one immediately in the position that they hold. On smaller vessels though were perhaps only ten or so officers and crew live in confined quarters the emphasis these days is on integration not segregation, to produce a more family orientated atmosphere so that life onboard is not wrought with ill-will.

The wearing of a uniform is not an integral part of the management structure. The structure is defined through the rank that one holds and this is clear to all concerned, there is no wavering of this structure, there is no option to change and like it or lump it if a person comes onboard with a certain rank then that is the position that he or she will assume. In a similar situation ashore, if a finance-orientated guy with all the appropriate qualifications is offered a job as Chief Financial Officer then he will expect and be expected to fulfill that role when he sits in the chair. He would certainly not like to find himself relegated to the basement as mail boy on his first day and nor would the company like to find out ten weeks down the line that he couldn’t add 2 + 2 never mind run accounts!

The management structure is divided into paths! The Captain has the ultimate authority on a vessel! The Captain is after all responsible for safe operations, the safety and well-being of his crew and will answer any questions asked regarding improper actions, unsafe work practices, oil pollution and accidents that may occur whether or not he was involved or even out of his bunk at the time. For example; if an Able Seaman gets drunk and beats up the cook during an argument then the Captain will be called to account. If the Chief Engineer overfills his bunker tanks and floods the Humber River with prime gas oil then the Captain will be looking for a lawyer from inside of the local nick! The position comes at a heavy price!

Under the Captain is the Chief Officer who will one day hope to become Captain or who will remain as a Chief Officer for the rest of his career if he does not feel that the responsibility that tags along is worth the price.

The Captain, the Chief Officer and in descending order the Second Officer and Third Officer (sometimes referred to as Deck Officers or Navigation Officers or by Engineers as Deck Tarts) are all trained as navigators! They are responsible for the safe navigation of the vessel, they are responsible for the stability and integrity of the vessel, for cargo operations (unless it gets too difficult for them and the engineers have to take over) and for ensuring that the correct paperwork is completed and filed for ships business relating to the above and as that defined by the office.

There is though another path or two to follow at sea, not everything is about navigation and form filling. The path of engineering and before anybody asks again, “no, a Chief Engineer cannot become a Captain”! Or to re-phrase that, he can become a Captain if he goes back to school and studies for three years, goes to sea in a junior rank for one year, then studies some more and then hopes that he gets promoted to a not so junior rank and then sails some in this rank and then studies some more at college and hopes that he passes and gets promoted ………to cut a long story short; should an engineer wish to become a navigating officer he would have to study and sail as a deck officer for a number of years and it might be ten or more years before he would sit in the Captains chair. The same works the other way around, a deck officer cannot wake up one morning and decide that he would prefer to go downstairs rather than up, a career path has been chosen and to change would involve a mass of financial input (which no company would entertain) and time.

The Chief Engineer is responsible for the maintenance of the vessel, the operation of its machinery and the fabric of the boat. He, like the Captain has worked long and hard to reach the position that he has attained and with this position comes the fact that he is second in command of the vessel and again that responsibility weighs heavily on his shoulders. He in turn is backed up by a second, third and fourth engineer who will all hopefully one day climb that ladder to fill the Chiefs shoes.

On typical trading vessels these are the two command lines of the management structure. There are other specialties, an electrician maybe included onboard and his responsibility will lie with anything electric, to maintain it in a desired safe and operable condition. He will remain an electrician throughout his career, neither gaining nor dropping in rank and will be on a par to the third engineer. Varying vessels might have other ranks to consider, fridge engineers, radio officers or cargo specialists, all are of middle rank and all fit into the structure underneath the top two, the Captain and the Chief Engineer.

Finally, yet equally important are the crewmembers, an integral part of the management structure with each sailor arriving onboard with appropriate training, experience and skills that make the back-bone of any boat, so to speak! Each department has the requisite number of able seaman, the deck has sufficient to handle cargo work, lookout and watch duties, the engine room has an oiler or two to look after the cleanliness of the machinery spaces and to provide needed support to the engineers. The cook may have a galley boy or girl to help with the washing of the dishes and to clean the officer’s cabins, hopefully he or she will one day rise up to become a cook, should they so desire. It must be remembered that crew members are integral to a vessels operation, some may rise up the ladder in years to come (though study and financial input) but generally speaking they are the work force and will remain crew members throughout their career.

This is the management structure! It is not open to discussion, it is set down on paper and like it or lump it this is the way it works. There are many occasions when the boundaries are crossed, when personalities clash or experience talks but the one underlying factor that inhibits excessive out-of-rank behavior is that with each rank comes a pre-defined responsibility so by either inflating oneself to a position of higher than given or deflating oneself down the ladder it does not change the rank structure or the inherent responsibilities tagged to it. If a mate starts barking orders to the engineers or changing course of the vessel without authority from the master he better have a good reason for doing so! If he did these actions without due cause, (maybe for the safety of the vessel) then he will find himself on the next plane home. If the Second Engineer decided to stop the engine for a bit of piece and quiet without first discussing this with the Chief Engineer then the world will come crashing around his ears! In addition, let us not forget, if an Able Seaman decides that he likes to drink coffee out of the Chief Officers personal cup, then he might find himself looking out for yellow submarines from the f/castle in a force nine gale!

In a similar situation ashore, a company for example that has directors, managers and a work force, all go home each night. The actions of the chef who decided that he should send an email on behalf of the supply manager to order 7000 pairs of high heels shoes, might find himself looking for another job or suffering the wrath of another, but he has not endangered lives and he has not crossed boundaries that could influence the health and safety of other souls. And should the financial director decide to walk into the interior design section of the company one day and make an order that the toilets should be painted black on all floors, the workers will probably find that there toilets are all painted black within the next few days. The financial director will happily sign the chit for the paint, the workers will not say boo and the company won’t blink an eye, he is the financial director after all. Nothing will even be said at the next directors meeting. The other directors will probably snicker and grumble behind his back but nothing will result and the toilets will remain black until some other director gets it into his head that they should be blue.

The rank structure or management structure is extremely defined at sea purely and simply because of the lack of links to ashore. The need for well-defined authority and the need to preserve that authority are required and without which the system would fail. If the system fails, the safety of the ship and its crew are at stake. One of the ways to preserve the rank structure is through strict regulation over the requirement to have a certain qualification to fill any rank, the higher you go the more you need.

Stepping ashore again, the Chief Planner in a factory may find that the assistant planner has ambitions. The Chief Planner may come to work one very average morning to find that his assistant planner had gone and implemented a plan that the Chief Planner had himself planned. The end result of the outright usurp of authority might be that the Chief Planner very shortly find himself reading the Jobs page in the local rag simply because the planning director liked the plan that the assistant planner had said he had planned. Not to get confused with all the plans, this obviously fictitious example has only been laid out to show one things: that qualifications ashore in a management structure are often of no importance. The chief planner could have had a degree in zoology, the assistant planner a bus-ticket it would matter not!

Ships have a very defined and on the table management structure, it is one that has worked for many decades and one that will be around for a lot longer to come. It has become fact that many companies ashore are looking toward engineers to run floating installations, were the rules-of-the-sea do not come into force and there are mutterings that engineers have a more diverse background, able to command a larger number of tasks and are therefore preferred in a shipping company management positions ashore – some of these murmurs might just be true. It may also be mentioned that Oil and Water don’t mix but despite this inconsequential banter and despite the continuing interference of the outside world, the management structure onboard is set in concrete for some time to come, it holds itself well through rough weather and bad and it rides smoothly into the troughs and sits proudly on the peaks – the shipboard management structure has a solid foundation!

Ieuan Dolby is the Author and Webmaster of SeaDolby.com. As a Chief Engineer in the Merchant Navy he has sailed the world for twenty years on a variety of rust buckets and state of the art vessels. Now living in Taiwan with his wife and son he writes about cultures across the globe and life as he sees it; a seafarers escapades with a few tall tales thrown in!

Pirate Attacks in the Modern World

Saturday, September 20th, 2008

By Katya Chili

Sea pirates seemed to be brave robbers and fearless adventurers in children’s books. Pirate attacks in the modern world are made by dangerous criminals who become more and more impudent. There were 325 pirate attacks registered on the whole planet in 2004 and 445 attacks a year before. Experts explained the decline of cases with activation of patrolling of Malaysia and Indonesia coasts.

Pirate Attacks are Getting More Cruel

Strait of Malacca between Indonesia and Malaysia is a long, narrow and very busy passage. It accounts for more than a quarter of the whole world’s volume of cargo transportation and a quarter of all pirate attacks. Decisive actions are required from the governments of this region. Then the cases of pirate attacks began to increase again. International Marine Bureau (IMB) reported that the number of ships attacked by pirates at blue water increased 10% in 2007 as compared with the previous year. 263 pirate attackes in 2007 were registered against 239 in 2006. This is foremost due to incidents of pirate attacks near the shores of East cental and Western Africa. The number of pirate attacks by East Central Africa seashores grew from 10 to 31, by Western Africa – from 12 to 42. The all-time number of taken hostages was 154 people near Somali seashores. IMB concludes that piracy became profitable business for the habitants of the poor African countries. Other “hotbeds of tension” are west seashores of Asia and South China Sea. Reports about pirate attacks in the Middle East, East Africa, Indian waters, South America are more freqient lately. Pirate attacks are accompanied by violence more frequently, specialists specify. Director of the IMB called most cases marine hooliganism. 64 people were killed or injured in 2007, while 17 people suffered in 2005. International Marine Bureau warned especially the crews of ships which use routes along the seashores of Western Africa. They should be extremely cautious with fishing boats asking for help.

Pirates Attack Different Ships

Pirates furrow the seas on the boats with powerful outboard motors and attack the first met decently looking ship as chance offers. Pirates board this ship by means of bamboo poles or ropes. Small ships and yachts are also suffering from pirate attacks. 53-year-old Peter Blake, known yachtsman and Greenpeace activist, was killed in December, 2001, at Brazil seashores during a piratic attack. Attacks of large merchant ships also happen, but rarer. They are the most attractive target for the pirates. IMB director, Captain Mukundan, said: “These operations are enough difficult, three-four ships are involved in them. The attack is made out of them. Pirates are usually well prepared physically and quite merciless in achieving of their aims”. Responsibility for such attacks was laid on Indonesian rebels in the past, but they are not considered the main offenders now. “Difficult pirate attacks are financed by the organized crime, with groupings which have enough resources, – Captain Pottengal Mukundan explains. – They have networks by which they sell captured goods, and places where they can hold stolen members of crew to ransom”. In a number of cases pirates killed crews with its full complement and took the management of ships upon themselves.

Pirates Attacked a Tanker

In 1998 in the South China Sea they captured the Petro Ranger tanker and maid sailors to teach them how to steer the ship. Then they compelled one of hostages to write a new name on the side and changed the Singaporean flag to Honduranian one. The tanker moved a little bit further from Chinese seashore, and the oil was dumped to another ship. And when the tanker was ready for over- registering (what would allow pirates to sell it for 16 million dollars), members of the crew succeeded to notify Chinese authorities.

Anti-pirate Laws

Experts say that anti-pirate laws are good, the problem is that they are executed badly. A license to steer a ship costs not so much money in poor countries. Authorities in small ports quite often don’t check registration documents as careful as they should. Stolen ships with new “passports” practically evaporate and become ships-ghosts.

Regional problems, politics and complicated relations often interfere in the business. As the director of IMB said, Indonesian and Malaysian border guards, for instance, do not operate in territorial waters of each other, even if they chase suspected. “It plays into the hands of pirates, – Captain Mukundan adds. – As the measures against pirates are not very effective, they feel safe, more and more sure about their forces. It’s very important that the law machinery assume the measures to authenticate performers of pirate attacks and punish them by the law”.

Yachts-VIP.com is a website about Boating and Yachting, where you can read more boating articles of boats and yachts subject, boating activities, engines, yacht owning and operating. Free post classified ad form, submit yachting articles and yachting news, add information about your company and URL.

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTRE DAME OILFIELDS MARITIME SERVICES, INC.
2440 Palm Court Street corner F.B. Harrison, 1300 Pasay City, Philippines
Telephone: +(632) 556-24-38 Tel/Fax: +(632) 556-28-14
Email: rbbernales@notredameshipping.com
POEA License No.: POEA-013-SB-070511-R